Research on Adaptive Decision Support System for Student Career Planning Based on Multi-Source Academic and Behavioural Data Fusion
Keywords:
Decision Support System, Multi-source Data Fusion, Educational Data Mining, Career Planning, XGBoost Algorithm, Fuzzy DEMATEL, Fuzzy TOPSIS, Multi-criteria Decision Making.Abstract
In the current highly dynamic and competitive global labour market, career planning and decision-making among higher education students have become critical factors directly influencing their future personal development and the effective allocation of human resources. Traditional career guidance models often rely heavily on static psychological assessment questionnaires and individual academic performance indicators, making it difficult to capture the multidimensional potential of students comprehensively or respond adaptively to rapidly changing industry requirements. To address these limitations, this study develops and implements a novel Adaptive Decision Support System (ADSS) designed to provide students with scientific, personalised, and dynamically evolving career path recommendations by integrating heterogeneous academic data with students’ behavioural data generated through digital learning platforms. At the system architecture level, the study proposes a two-stage cascading framework that integrates machine learning prediction with fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making. The prediction module employs the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm to extract high-dimensional features from unstructured Learning Management System (LMS) interaction data and structured academic records, thereby capturing students’ implicit soft skills and explicit hard skills while generating objective matching probabilities for different career options. The decision-making module subsequently incorporates multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) theory to examine the interrelationships among career selection criteria using the fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (Fuzzy DEMATEL) method and determine their objective weights. Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Fuzzy TOPSIS) is then applied to integrate students’ subjective preferences and cognitive uncertainty, enabling the comprehensive evaluation and optimisation of alternative career pathways. The results of large-scale empirical analysis indicate that incorporating behavioural data increases the system’s career compatibility prediction accuracy to 93.42%, substantially outperforming the traditional single-source data baseline model. Furthermore, the integrated MCDM framework effectively addresses conflicts among multiple objectives and uncertainties in subjective preferences, allowing the resulting career planning recommendations to remain both data-driven and interpretable while accounting for individual value preferences. The study therefore contributes to the interdisciplinary integration of educational data mining (EDM) and fuzzy decision science while offering higher education institutions a practical system-level solution for implementing targeted and intelligent career guidance interventions.
Downloads
References
[1] Monek, G. D., & Fischer, S. (2025). Expert twin: A digital twin with an integrated fuzzy-based decision-making module. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 8(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame8120251181
[2] Sabry, K. A., Abdelhakim, M. N. A., Abdeldayem, M. M., & Aldulaimi, S. H. (2022). Dynamic career path decision support systems: A design perspective. Global Scientific Journal, 10(5), 2325-2347. https://www.globalscientificjournal.com/researchpaper/Dynamic_Career_Path_Decision_Support_Systems_A_Design_Perspective.pdf
[3] Herath, G. A. C. A., Kumara, B. T. G. S., Ishanka, U. A. P., & Rathnayaka, R. M. K. T. (2024). Computer-assisted career guidance tools for students’ career path planning: A review on enabling technologies and applications. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 23, 006. https://doi.org/10.28945/5265
[4] Nazri, E. M., Benjamin, A. M., & Rahman, S. A. (2018). Students' career decision support system. Journal of Social Sciences Research(6), 683-694. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi6.683.694
[5] Kothari, M., Doshi, M., & Mathur, S. (2025). Design and implementation of an AI-based career advisor using cognitive profiling and skills analytics 2025 9th International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC), https://doi.org/10.1109/icisc65841.2025.11188226
[6] Walek, B., Pektor, O., & Farana, R. (2021). Decision support system for evaluating suitable job applicants. Mathematics, 9(15), 1773. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9151773
[7] Bhatkar, S., Ingle, A., Korde, S., Bobade, P., Kohale, L., & Vaidya, V. P. (2026). One-stop personalized career & education advisor. International Journal of Ingenious Research, Invention and Development, 5(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19412401
[8] Zhao, L., Chen, K., Song, J., Zhu, X., Sun, J., Caulfield, B., & Mac Namee, B. (2020). Academic performance prediction based on multisource, multifeature behavioral data. Ieee Access, 9, 5453-5465. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3002791
[9] Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2010). Educational data mining: A review of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 40(6), 601-618. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2053532
[10] Baker, R., & Siemens, G. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (2 ed., pp. 253-272). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139519526.016
[11] Sahoo, S. K., Choudhury, B. B., Dhal, P. R., Majhi, S., Dhar, I., & Sahu, S. (2026). Three decades of multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods (1996–2026): A comprehensive review of advancements, applications, and future directions. Journal of Contemporary Decision Science, 2(1), 400-439. https://doi.org/10.67334/cds21202631
[12] Kocaman, H., & Asan, U. (2025). Integration modes between MCDM methods and machine learning algorithms: A structured approach for framework development. Mathematics, 14(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/math14010033
[13] Jabbarova, K., & Amrahova, L. (2026). Evaluation of university students’ career opportunities using the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method. Sciences of Europe(181), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18427421
[14] Ersen, M., Taşabat, S. E., & Söylemez, K. C. (2025). Evaluation of the factors affecting the career choice of statistics students with fuzzy dematel and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(29), 77-122. https://doi.org/10.53092/duiibfd.1608423
[15] Yin, S., Imran, R., Ullah, K., Ali, Z., & Haleemzai, I. (2025). Responsible AI in student management: preventing misdecision in career choice of university students under inaccurate guidance. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 38177. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-22127-7
[16] Li, W., & Xu, X. (2023). Ensemble learning algorithm - research analysis on the management of financial fraud and violation in listed companies. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 6(2), 722-733. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame622023785
[17] Liu, Y. (2023). Design of XGboost prediction model for financial operation fraud of listed companies. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 14(6), 2354-2364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-02083-z
[18] Kabak, M. (2013). A fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP based multi criteria decision making approach for personnel selection. Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing, 20(5-6), 571–593. https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A8%3A28189336/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Acrawler-gcd&id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A109041384&jrnl=15423980
[19] Mukhametzyanov, I. (2021). Specific character of objective methods for determining weights of criteria in MCDM problems: Entropy, CRITIC and SD. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(2), 76-105. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame210402076i
[20] Pap, J., Makó, C., Horváth, A., Baracskai, Z., Zelles, T., Bilinovics-Sipos, J., & Remsei, S. (2025). Enhancing supply chain safety and security: A novel AI-assisted supplier selection method. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 8(1), 22-41. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame8120251115
[21] Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x
[22] Petrovic, I., & Kankaras, M. (2020). A hybridized IT2FS-DEMATEL-AHP-TOPSIS multicriteria decision making approach: Case study of selection and evaluation of criteria for determination of air traffic control radar position. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(1), 146-164. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/25166026211034506
[23] Modibbo, U. M., Hassan, M., Ahmed, A., & Ali, I. (2022). Multi-criteria decision analysis for pharmaceutical supplier selection problem using fuzzy TOPSIS. Management Decision, 60(3), 806-836. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-10-2020-1335
[24] Alp, S., & Özkan, T. K. (2015). Job choice with multi-criteria decision making approach in a fuzzy environment. International Review of Management and Marketing, 5(3), 165-172. https://izlik.org/JA44XT38RC
[25] Ashrafzadeh, M., Rafiei, F. M., Isfahani, N. M., & Zare, Z. (2012). Application of fuzzy TOPSIS method for the selection of Warehouse Location: A Case Study. Interdisciplinary journal of contemporary research in business, 3(9), 655-671. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Farimah-Mokhatab-Rafiei/publication/265521806
[26] Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000-3011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162
[27] Vinodh, S., & Swarnakar, V. (2015). Lean six sigma project selection using hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL–ANP–TOPSIS. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 6(4), 313-338. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-12-2014-0041
[28] Li, H. (2026). A Fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP-TOPSIS Model for Cross-Border E-Commerce Driven Agricultural Value Chain Upgrading in Henan. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 9(1), 157-175. https://www.dmame-journal.org/index.php/dmame/article/view/1756
[29] Ali, A. M., Abdelhafeez, A., Soliman, T. H., & ELMenshawy, K. (2024). A probabilistic hesitant fuzzy MCDM approach to selecting treatment policy for COVID-19. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 7(1), 131-144. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame712024917
[30] Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2012). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method for facility location selection. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/71934158/article1380541478_Safari_20et_20al-libre.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

