Decision-Making and Risk Management in School Bullying Risk: Serial Mediation of Peer Relationships and Internet Addiction between Negative Parenting Styles and Adolescent Bullying

Authors

  • Huafeng Si Henan University of Chinese Medicine
  • Dandan Zhang Henan University of Chinese Medicine.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31081/dmame8220251613

Keywords:

parenting styles, peer relationships, internet addiction, school bullying behaviors, adolescents, risk management, operations management, Decision-Making

Abstract

Understanding the underlying causes of school bullying is essential for developing effective prevention strategies. This study aims to investigate the impact of negative parenting styles on school bullying behaviors among adolescents, emphasizing the serial mediation role of peer relationships and internet addiction. In addition, the study frames school bullying as a decision-making and risk management challenge within organizational and governance contexts, highlighting how evidence-based models can guide sustainable operations management. A survey was administered to 756 randomly sampled students from junior and senior high schools in Henan, China. Assessment tools included the Parenting Styles Scale, Peer Relationships Scale, Internet Addiction Questionnaire, and School Bullying Behaviors Questionnaire. (1) Significant pairwise correlations were found between any two of the studied variables: negative parenting styles, peer relationships, internet addiction, and school bullying behavior. (2) Parental rejection and overprotection are two dimensions of negative parenting, and both were positive predictors of school bullying behaviors. (3) The impact of negative parenting styles on school bullying behaviors was mediated by three pathways: parental rejection → peer relationships → school bullying, parental overprotection → peer relationships → school bullying, and parental rejection → peer relationships → internet addiction → school bullying. Viewing bullying as an organizational risk, we map the mechanisms into a PDCA loop: identification via brief screeners to create risk profiles; intervention through parenting support, classroom‑climate routines, and tiered digital‑behavior programs; and evaluation using operational indicators (peer‑relationship means, ≥4 internet‑addiction proportion, bullying incidence). Digital‑behavior programs are prioritized when parental rejection is salient, whereas autonomy‑support and peer‑climate strengthening dominate under overprotection, with digital governance added only when peer deficits co‑occur with problematic use—thus enabling evidence‑based, socially sustainable school governance. Overall, the contribution of this study lies in integrating psychological, social, and behavioral insights into a structured decision-making framework, thereby advancing risk management and operations-management approaches for educational governance

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bickham, D. S. (2021). Current research and viewpoints on internet addiction in adolescents. Current pediatrics reports, 9(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-020-00236-3

[2] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design (Vol. 352). Harvard university press. https://khoerulanwarbk.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/urie_bronfenbrenner_the_ecology_of_human_developbokos-z1.pdf

[3] Chen, S. H., Zhou, Q., Eisenberg, N., Valiente, C., & Wang, Y. (2011). Parental expressivity and parenting styles in Chinese families: Prospective and unique relations to children's psychological adjustment. Parenting, 11(4), 288-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2011.613725

[4] Cheng, Y. (2024). The Root Causes and Countermeasures of Campus Bullying: A Study on the Phenomenon of School Bullying Among Middle School Students in Shanghai, China. International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications, 13(5), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.7753/IJSEA1305.1002

[5] Chou, C., & Lee, Y.-H. (2017). The moderating effects of internet parenting styles on the relationship between internet parenting behavior, internet expectancy, and internet addiction tendency. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(3), 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0334-5

[6] Fitzgerald, M., & Gallus, K. (2020). Emotional support as a mechanism linking childhood maltreatment and adult’s depressive and social anxiety symptoms. Child abuse & neglect, 108, 104645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104645

[7] Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child's environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological review, 102(3), 458. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.458

[8] Hu, Q., & Feng, Q. (2022). Parenting style and prosocial behaviour among Chinese Preschool children: A moderation model. Early Child Development and Care, 192(9), 1444-1461. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2021.1888942

[9] Huang, X., Li, Q., Hao, Y., & An, N. (2024). The relationship between a competitive school climate and school bullying among secondary vocational school students in China: a moderated mediation model. Behavioral Sciences, 14(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14020129

[10] Kapoor, I., Sharma, S., & Khosla, M. (2020). Social anxiety disorder among adolescents in relation to peer pressure and family environment. Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications, 13(2), 923-929. https://doi.org/10.21786/bbrc/13.2/80

[11] Kopko, K. (2007). Parenting styles and adolescents. Cornell University Cooperative Extension. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from http. https://www.countrysideday.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Parenting-Styles-and-Adolescents.pdf

[12] Li, H., Liu, C., Shen, X., Nan, Y., & Feng, L. (2024). Analysis of the current situation and factors influencing bullying in junior high schools in backward areas of Western, China & A case study of Qingyang City in Gasu. BMC public health, 24(1), 1295. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18775-5

[13] Li, H., Luo, M., Duan, B., Kawulia, A., Su, M., & Di, H. (2024). Family socioeconomic status and young children digital addiction: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1435575. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1435575

[14] Li, L., Xu, D., Chai, J., Wang, D., Li, L., Zhang, L., Li, L., Ng, C. H., Ungvari, G. S., Mei, S., & Xiang, Y. (2018). Prevalence of Internet addiction disorder in Chinese university students: a comprehensive meta-analysis of observational studies. J. Behav. Addict, 7(3), 610-623. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.53

[15] Moon, S. J., Hwang, J. S., Kim, J. Y., Shin, A. L., Bae, S. M., & Kim, J. W. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(8), 473-484. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0154

[16] Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M. D., Haynie, D. L., Ruan, W. J., & Scheidt, P. C. (2003). Relationships between bullying and violence among US youth. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 157(4), 348-353. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.157.4.348

[17] Pickering, L., Hadwin, J. A., & Kovshoff, H. (2020). The role of peers in the development of social anxiety in adolescent girls: A systematic review. Adolescent research review, 5(4), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00117-x

[18] Scanlon, C. L., Del Toro, J., & Wang, M.-T. (2020). Socially anxious science achievers: The roles of peer social support and social engagement in the relation between adolescents’ social anxiety and science achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(5), 1005-1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01224-y

[19] Tian, F., & Tian, L. (2014). Three Models of Effects of Parent-Child Relationship and Friendship on Problematic Behaviors. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(6), 968-976. https://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/abstract/abstract3101.shtml

[20] Wang, H., Xiong, Y., & Liu, X. (2018). The protective roles of parent-child relationship and friend support on emotional and behavioral adjustment of migrant adolescents. Psychol Dev Educ, 34(5), 614-624. https://devpsy.bnu.edu.cn/EN/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.05.12

[21] Wang, H., Zhou, X., Lu, C., Wu, J., Deng, X., Hong, L., Gao, X., & He, Y. (2012). Adolescent bullying involvement and psychosocial aspects of family and school life: A cross-sectional study from Guangdong Province in China. PloS one, 7(7), e38619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038619

[22] Yang, S. C. (2012). Paths to bullying in online gaming: The effects of gender, preference for playing violent games, hostility, and aggressive behavior on bullying. Journal of educational computing research, 47(3), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.47.3.a

[23] Young, J. E. (1986). A cognitive-behavioral approach to friendship disorders. In Friendship and social interaction (pp. 247-276). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4880-4_13

[24] Zhou, Y., Xu, B., Shi, J., & Lin, X. (2023). Authoritarian Parenting and Physical Bullying: The Mediation Effect of Aggression Attitudes and the Dual Moderation Effects of Low Self-Control and Teacher Support. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230525

[25] Zhu, X., Wang, K., & Ren, W. (2025). Parenting styles and adolescents’ involvement in school bullying: the indirect effects of big five personality traits. Current Psychology, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08233-9

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Huafeng Si, & Dandan Zhang. (2025). Decision-Making and Risk Management in School Bullying Risk: Serial Mediation of Peer Relationships and Internet Addiction between Negative Parenting Styles and Adolescent Bullying. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 8(2), 836–847. https://doi.org/10.31081/dmame8220251613