Ranking Logistics System Configurations Based on Flexibility and Elasticity: A Case Study Using IMF SWARA-MABAC Approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame7120241439

Keywords:

Logistics, System, Flexibility, Elasticity, IMF SWARA, MABAC

Abstract

Flexibility equips organisations with the capability to respond effectively to fluctuating market dynamics. This encompasses managing delivery delays, modifying delivery schedules and frequencies, and accommodating alterations in order requirements. Multiple forms of flexibility exist, each possessing unique attributes, which are explored further within the study. Conversely, elasticity within logistics typically denotes the supply chain's ability to reorganise and preserve core functions amidst internal or external disruptions. It represents the system’s potential to either restore its original condition or adapt to altered circumstances while maintaining an acceptable performance threshold. Given these considerations, the relevance of flexibility and elasticity to a logistics enterprise and its operational mechanisms is apparent. In response to this, the central objective of the study was to construct a detailed framework for ranking logistics systems according to these two attributes. To achieve this, the Improved Fuzzy Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (IMF SWARA) technique was applied to ascertain the weighting of evaluation criteria, whereas the Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) method facilitated the ranking procedure. The framework was tested by assessing five separate logistics systems across six pertinent criteria. Results demonstrated that, in terms of both flexibility and elasticity, Alternative A5—Automated Smart Logistics incorporating Internet of Things (IoT) sensors—emerged as the most effective system

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Barad, M., & Sapir, D. E. (2003). Flexibility in logistic systems—modeling and performance evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(2), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00107-5

[2] Bhatia, G., Lane, C., & Wain, A. (2013). Building resilience in supply chains. World Economic Forum, 1-44. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_RRN_MO_BuildingResilienceSupplyChains_Report_2013.pdf.

[3] Choi, T.-M. (2021). Facing market disruptions: values of elastic logistics in service supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 59(1), 286-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1722861

[4] Jafari, H. (2015). Logistics flexibility: a systematic review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(7), 947-970. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2014-0069

[5] Kahn, J. (2024). A flexible time-to-build model of supply chain disruptions. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 35(3), 321-343. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpae007

[6] Kashem, M. A., Shamsuddoha, M., & Nasir, T. (2024). Digital-era resilience: Navigating logistics and supply chain operations after COVID-19. Businesses, 4(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses4010001

[7] Korucuk, S., & Aytekin, A. (2023). Evaluating logistics flexibility in Istanbul-based companies using Interval-Valued Fermatean Fuzzy SWARA. J. Intell Manag. Decis, 2(4), 192-201. https://doi.org/10.56578/jimd020404

[8] Koussis, N., & Silaghi, F. (2023). Revenue-sharing and volume flexibility in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 261, 108845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108845

[9] Kozoderović, J., Andrejić, M., & Pajić, V. (2024). Strategic selection of crowd logistics platforms: A multi-criteria decision-making approach. Mechatron. Intell. Transp. Syst, 3(4), 235-253. https://doi.org/10.56578/mits030404

[10] Lee, M., Hong, J., Cheong, T., & Lee, H. (2021). Flexible delivery routing for elastic logistics: a model and an algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(7), 6864-6882. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3063195

[11] Li, J., Fu, H., Lai, K. K., & Ram, B. (2023). A city Logistics distribution model: a physical internet approach. Processes, 11(11), 3198. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11113198

[12] Nakalamić, M., Pajić, V., & Andrejić, M. (2024). Exploring the attitudes of couriers in crowdsourced delivery systems: A study on operational challenges and platform dynamics. J. Urban Dev. Manag, 3(4), 288-309. https://doi.org/10.56578/judm030405

[13] Piprani, A. Z., Jaafar, N. I., Ali, S. M., Mubarik, M. S., & Shahbaz, M. (2022). Multi-dimensional supply chain flexibility and supply chain resilience: the role of supply chain risks exposure. Operations Management Research, 15(1), 307-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00232-w

[14] Rama Murthy, S., Sousa-Zomer, T. T., Minshall, T., Velu, C., Kazantsev, N., & McFarlane, D. (2024). Elastic manufacturing: provisioning and deprovisioning production capacity to vary product volume and mix. International journal of operations & production management, 44(11), 1861-1885. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-02-2023-0129

[15] Shardeo, V., Patil, A., Dwivedi, A., & Madaan, J. (2022). Investigating the transport flexibility measures for freight transportation: a fuzzy best-worst method approach. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 43(2), 268-295. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2022.126013

[16] Sharifi, H., & Zhang, Z. (2001). Agile manufacturing in practice‐Application of a methodology. International journal of operations & production management, 21(5/6), 772-794. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110390462

[17] Sharma, M., Luthra, S., Joshi, S., Kumar, A., & Jain, A. (2023). Green logistics driven circular practices adoption in industry 4.0 Era: A moderating effect of institution pressure and supply chain flexibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 383, 135284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135284

[18] Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2006). The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: scale development and model testing. Journal of Operations management, 24(2), 170-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.05.002

[19] Talaie, H. (2025). Identification and Ranking of Healthcare Supply Chain Resilience Enablers with a Focus on Public Hospitals. Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge (quarterly), 15(1), 5-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/DMKP.15.1.714.2

[20] Vrtagić, S., Softić, E., Subotić, M., Stević, Ž., Dordevic, M., & Ponjavic, M. (2021). Ranking road sections based on MCDM model: New improved fuzzy SWARA (IMF SWARA). Axioms, 10(2), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10020092

[21] Wang, D. (2023). Quality Management and Control for the Whole-Process Logistics Service of Multi-Variety Small-Batch Production and Manufacturing. Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés, 56(1). http://doi.org/10.18280/jesa.560110

[22] Zhang, Q., Vonderembse, M. A., & Lim, J. S. (2005). Logistics flexibility and its impact on customer satisfaction. The International journal of logistics management, 16(1), 71-95. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090510617367

[23] Zhang, S., Wang, H., Li, G., & Wang, J. (2023). Modeling of the resilient supply chain system from a perspective of production design changes. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10(1), 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-022-0235-z

[24] Zhovnirchyk, Y., Bondarchuk, N., Cherkaska, V., Terletska, V., & Gusiev, V. (2023). Sustainable Development of the Agro-Industrial Complex through Modeling Aspects of Logistics Management. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 18(6). http://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180627

Downloads

Published

2024-06-29

How to Cite

Zhouyu Zeng, Jinbo Song, Mengchun Zhou, & Jianjun Wang. (2024). Ranking Logistics System Configurations Based on Flexibility and Elasticity: A Case Study Using IMF SWARA-MABAC Approach. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 7(1), 771–785. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame7120241439